
Tennessee’s 3-point attempts in a conference game and in a nonconference game
, ,
Through Tennessee’s game on Mar 20, 2026.
Against what the season’s ratings expected, Tennessee was 2.9 3-point attempts under in a conference game and 5.0 3-point attempts over in a nonconference game over its last 60 games, 35 games against 25. The plain averages are 27.1 and 34.8, a difference of 7.7.
Tennessee’s −7.9 in a conference game vs in a nonconference game over expected ranks 363rd of the 363 teams with 6 games on each side over their last 60 games through Mar 20, 2026.
3-point attempts a game over expected
A −7.9 difference in 3-point attempts over expected in a conference game vs in a nonconference game is rare: shuffle which games were in a conference game and it comes up less than once in 100.
A −7.7 difference in 3-point attempts in a conference game vs in a nonconference game is rare: shuffle which games were in a conference game and it comes up less than once in 100.
The games
| Side | Date | Game | Result | 3-point attempts | Expected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 26, 2024 | vs | W | 41 | 28.9 | |
| Dec 4, 2024 | vs | W | 35 | 27.5 | |
| Dec 7, 2024 | vs | W | 29 | 32.2 | |
| Dec 14, 2024 | vs | W | 63 | 29.9 | |
| Dec 18, 2024 | @ | W | 37 | 29.9 | |
| Dec 20, 2024 | vs | W | 31 | 32.1 | |
| Dec 21, 2024 | vs | W | 32 | 30.1 | |
| Dec 29, 2024 | vs | W | 31 | 30.9 | |
| Jan 2, 2025 | @ | W | 23 | 31.0 | |
| Jan 5, 2025 | vs | L | 36 | 33.5 | |
| Jan 9, 2025 | vs | L | 31 | 33.9 | |
| Jan 12, 2025 | @ | W | 34 | 32.4 | |
| Jan 16, 2025 | vs | W | 26 | 33.4 | |
| Jan 19, 2025 | @ | L | 26 | 30.1 | |
| Jan 23, 2025 | @ | L | 17 | 24.7 | |
| Jan 27, 2025 | vs | L | 26 | 28.4 | |
| Feb 2, 2025 | @ | W | 25 | 30.7 | |
| Feb 6, 2025 | vs | W | 28 | 31.1 | |
| Feb 9, 2025 | @ | L | 18 | 34.3 | |
| Feb 13, 2025 | vs | W | 28 | 26.7 | |
| Feb 16, 2025 | vs | W | 15 | 25.0 | |
| Feb 20, 2025 | vs | W | 21 | 29.7 | |
| Feb 23, 2025 | @ | W | 29 | 32.0 | |
| Feb 27, 2025 | @ | L | 29 | 29.3 | |
| Mar 2, 2025 | vs | L | 28 | 31.9 | |
| Mar 5, 2025 | vs | W | 36 | 30.3 | |
| Mar 6, 2025 | vs | L | 29 | 30.1 | |
| Mar 21, 2025 | vs | W | 37 | 28.5 | |
| Mar 23, 2025 | @ | W | 34 | 29.3 | |
| Mar 29, 2025 | vs | L | 26 | 24.4 | |
| Nov 4, 2025 | vs | L | 33 | 31.7 | |
| Nov 7, 2025 | vs | W | 38 | 26.3 | |
| Nov 9, 2025 | @ | W | 29 | 33.1 | |
| Nov 13, 2025 | vs | W | 34 | 30.4 | |
| Nov 20, 2025 | @ | W | 34 | 30.2 | |
| Nov 23, 2025 | vs | W | 40 | 29.5 | |
| Nov 30, 2025 | @ | L | 30 | 28.4 | |
| Dec 3, 2025 | @ | W | 26 | 27.1 | |
| Dec 14, 2025 | vs | W | 42 | 30.6 | |
| Dec 20, 2025 | vs | L | 25 | 29.0 | |
| Dec 22, 2025 | vs | W | 48 | 32.5 | |
| Jan 1, 2026 | vs | W | 25 | 28.1 | |
| Jan 4, 2026 | @ | W | 21 | 27.5 | |
| Jan 8, 2026 | @ | W | 27 | 29.9 | |
| Jan 11, 2026 | vs | W | 41 | 33.8 | |
| Jan 18, 2026 | @ | W | 20 | 27.8 | |
| Jan 22, 2026 | vs | W | 30 | 27.6 | |
| Jan 29, 2026 | vs | L | 21 | 30.6 | |
| Feb 1, 2026 | @ | L | 31 | 29.8 | |
| Feb 5, 2026 | @ | W | 37 | 28.4 | |
| Feb 8, 2026 | @ | L | 44 | 29.4 | |
| Feb 12, 2026 | vs | W | 29 | 35.8 | |
| Feb 15, 2026 | vs | L | 21 | 24.9 | |
| Feb 17, 2026 | @ | L | 24 | 24.0 | |
| Feb 19, 2026 | vs | L | 29 | 30.2 | |
| Feb 22, 2026 | @ | L | 29 | 32.4 | |
| Feb 26, 2026 | @ | L | 29 | 34.4 | |
| Mar 1, 2026 | vs | L | 21 | 30.3 | |
| Mar 5, 2026 | vs | L | 23 | 27.8 | |
| Mar 20, 2026 | vs | L | 36 | 31.5 |
Method
- Expected is an offense and a defense a team, fit over every game of its season between two teams in the table with the game being read left out, plus 0.2 in 2024-25, plus 0.2 in 2025-26 for the home team (the edge the fit finds once strength is in), nothing at a neutral site.
- Each expected number is then fit to the season’s games: a game bears out about 92% in 2024-25, 93% in 2025-26 of the difference the model predicts.
- The shuffle keeps the season’s shape: the games are cut in two where one date leaves the least variance, each game is read against its stretch, and the sides are shuffled only inside each stretch.