
UNC Asheville’s turnovers in a conference game and in a nonconference game
, ,
Against what the season’s ratings expected, UNC Asheville was 1.3 turnovers under in a conference game and NaN turnovers over in a nonconference game over its last 60 games, 36 games against 16. The plain averages are 9.1 and 12.8, a difference of 3.7.
UNC Asheville’s NaN in a conference game vs in a nonconference game over expected ranks 1st of the 365 teams with 6 games on each side over their last 60 games.
turnovers a game over expected
A NaN difference in turnovers over expected in a conference game vs in a nonconference game is rare: shuffle which games were in a conference game and it comes up less than once in 100.
A −3.7 difference in turnovers in a conference game vs in a nonconference game is rare: shuffle which games were in a conference game and it comes up less than once in 100.
The games
| Side | Date | Game | Result | turnovers | Expected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 3, 2024 | @ | L | 14 | 11.1 | |
| Dec 7, 2024 | vsSSt. Andrews | W | 14 | — | |
| Dec 11, 2024 | vsBBluefield | W | 8 | — | |
| Dec 14, 2024 | vs | W | 13 | 8.3 | |
| Dec 17, 2024 | vs | W | 14 | 9.6 | |
| Dec 19, 2024 | vsVVirginia Lynchburg | W | 7 | — | |
| Dec 21, 2024 | @ | L | 10 | 10.3 | |
| Dec 30, 2024 | vsCColumbia International | W | 9 | — | |
| Jan 4, 2025 | vs | W | 2 | 9.4 | |
| Jan 8, 2025 | @ | L | 12 | 12.6 | |
| Jan 11, 2025 | @ | W | 6 | 10.4 | |
| Jan 15, 2025 | vs | W | 6 | 10.6 | |
| Jan 18, 2025 | vs | W | 10 | 11.6 | |
| Jan 22, 2025 | @ | W | 7 | 9.3 | |
| Jan 25, 2025 | @ | W | 10 | 8.5 | |
| Jan 29, 2025 | vs | W | 11 | 8.7 | |
| Feb 6, 2025 | vs | W | 10 | 8.5 | |
| Feb 8, 2025 | @ | L | 11 | 9.4 | |
| Feb 12, 2025 | @ | W | 8 | 11.1 | |
| Feb 15, 2025 | vs | W | 5 | 8.2 | |
| Feb 20, 2025 | @ | L | 10 | 9.4 | |
| Feb 22, 2025 | vs | W | 11 | 12.0 | |
| Feb 26, 2025 | vs | L | 7 | 9.7 | |
| Mar 1, 2025 | @ | L | 16 | 11.8 | |
| Mar 7, 2025 | vs | W | 7 | 8.4 | |
| Mar 8, 2025 | vs | L | 14 | 11.6 | |
| Nov 4, 2025 | @ | L | 16 | 10.2 | |
| Nov 8, 2025 | @ | L | 18 | 11.6 | |
| Nov 11, 2025 | vs | W | 14 | 10.9 | |
| Nov 13, 2025 | vsBBryan | W | 9 | — | |
| Nov 19, 2025 | @ | L | 8 | 9.8 | |
| Nov 25, 2025 | vs | L | 22 | 11.5 | |
| Nov 30, 2025 | vs | W | 11 | 8.2 | |
| Dec 2, 2025 | vs | W | 7 | 9.2 | |
| Dec 6, 2025 | @ | L | 11 | 12.2 | |
| Dec 10, 2025 | vs | L | 11 | 10.9 | |
| Dec 13, 2025 | vs | L | 14 | 10.5 | |
| Dec 16, 2025 | vsKKentucky Christian | W | 20 | — | |
| Dec 18, 2025 | vsMMorris | W | 13 | — | |
| Dec 21, 2025 | @ | L | 12 | 10.7 | |
| Dec 31, 2025 | vs | L | 5 | 12.9 | |
| Jan 3, 2026 | @ | L | 7 | 8.7 | |
| Jan 7, 2026 | vs | W | 10 | 11.8 | |
| Jan 10, 2026 | @ | W | 10 | 11.9 | |
| Jan 14, 2026 | @ | L | 8 | 9.5 | |
| Jan 17, 2026 | vs | L | 10 | 10.4 | |
| Jan 21, 2026 | @ | W | 8 | 10.4 | |
| Jan 29, 2026 | vs | W | 8 | 9.7 | |
| Jan 31, 2026 | @ | L | 8 | 11.0 | |
| Feb 4, 2026 | vs | W | 12 | 9.6 | |
| Feb 12, 2026 | @ | W | 7 | 12.5 | |
| Feb 14, 2026 | vs | L | 7 | 9.0 | |
| Feb 19, 2026 | @ | L | 15 | 12.9 | |
| Feb 21, 2026 | vs | W | 8 | 11.5 | |
| Feb 26, 2026 | @ | W | 10 | 10.1 | |
| Feb 28, 2026 | vs | L | 8 | 8.1 | |
| Mar 6, 2026 | vs | W | 12 | 11.9 | |
| Mar 7, 2026 | vs | L | 12 | 12.8 | |
| Nov 2, 2026 | @ | L | 18 | NaN | |
| Nov 4, 2026 | vsEErskine | W | 14 | — |
Method
- Expected is an offense and a defense a team, fit over every game of its season between two teams in the table with the game being read left out, minus 0.3 in 2024-25, minus 0.3 in 2025-26, plus 0.0 in 2026-27 for the home team (the edge the fit finds once strength is in), nothing at a neutral site.
- Each expected number is then fit to the season’s games: a game bears out about 83% in 2024-25, 81% in 2025-26, NaN% in 2026-27 of the difference the model predicts.
- The shuffle keeps the season’s shape: the games are cut in two where one date leaves the least variance, each game is read against its stretch, and the sides are shuffled only inside each stretch.
- St. Andrews, Bluefield, Virginia Lynchburg, Columbia International, Bryan, Kentucky Christian, Morris, Erskine have no other game in the table, so those games have no expected number and sit out the second figure.