
Manchester United’s points vs a top-half team and vs a bottom-half team
, ,
Through Manchester United’s game on May 24, 2026.
Against what the season’s ratings expected, Manchester United was 0.98 points over vs a top-half team and 0.60 points under vs a bottom-half team in 2025-26, 16 games against 17. The plain averages are 2.56 and 1.35, a difference of 1.21. All 3 games without Bruno Fernandes were vs a bottom-half team.
Manchester United’s +1.58 vs a top-half team and vs a bottom-half team over expected ranks 1st of the 96 teams with 5 games on each side in 2025-26 through May 24.
points a game over expected
A +1.58 difference in points over expected vs a top-half team and vs a bottom-half team is rare: shuffle which games were vs a top-half team and it comes up less than once in 100.
A +1.21 difference in points vs a top-half team and vs a bottom-half team is unusual: shuffle which games were vs a top-half team and it comes up once in 100.
The games
| Side | Date | Game | Result | points | Expected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 17, 2025 | vs | L | 0 | 1.34 | |
| Aug 24, 2025 | @ | T | 1 | 1.68 | |
| Aug 30, 2025 | vs | W | 3 | 2.50 | |
| Sep 14, 2025 | @ | L | 0 | 1.23 | |
| Sep 20, 2025 | vs | W | 3 | 1.90 | |
| Sep 27, 2025 | @ | L | 0 | 1.61 | |
| Oct 4, 2025 | vs | W | 3 | 1.79 | |
| Oct 19, 2025 | @ | W | 3 | 1.43 | |
| Oct 25, 2025 | vs | W | 3 | 1.83 | |
| Nov 1, 2025 | @ | T | 1 | 1.76 | |
| Nov 8, 2025 | @ | T | 1 | 1.73 | |
| Nov 24, 2025 | vs | L | 0 | 2.07 | |
| Nov 30, 2025 | @ | W | 3 | 1.63 | |
| Dec 4, 2025 | vs | T | 1 | 2.26 | |
| Dec 8, 2025 | @ | W | 3 | 2.17 | |
| Dec 15, 2025 | vs | T | 1 | 1.68 | |
| Dec 21, 2025 | @ | L | 0 | 1.43 | |
| Dec 26, 2025 | vs | W | 3 | 1.95 | |
| Dec 30, 2025 | vs | T | 1 | 2.61 | |
| Jan 4, 2026 | @ | T | 1 | 1.63 | |
| Jan 7, 2026 | @ | T | 1 | 2.24 | |
| Jan 17, 2026 | vs | W | 3 | 1.46 | |
| Jan 25, 2026 | @ | W | 3 | 0.88 | |
| Feb 1, 2026 | vs | W | 3 | 1.94 | |
| Feb 7, 2026 | vs | W | 3 | 2.00 | |
| Feb 10, 2026 | @ | T | 1 | 1.91 | |
| Feb 23, 2026 | @ | W | 3 | 1.59 | |
| Mar 1, 2026 | vs | W | 3 | 1.98 | |
| Mar 4, 2026 | @ | L | 0 | 1.72 | |
| Mar 15, 2026 | vs | W | 3 | 1.65 | |
| Mar 20, 2026 | @ | T | 1 | 1.33 | |
| Apr 13, 2026 | vs | L | 0 | 2.02 | |
| Apr 18, 2026 | @ | W | 3 | 1.55 | |
| Apr 27, 2026 | vs | W | 3 | 1.83 | |
| May 3, 2026 | vs | W | 3 | 1.77 | |
| May 9, 2026 | @ | T | 1 | 1.53 | |
| May 17, 2026 | vs | W | 3 | 2.02 | |
| May 24, 2026 | @ | W | 3 | 1.48 |
Method
- Expected is an offense and a defense a team, fit over every 2025-26 game between two teams in the table with the game being read left out, plus 0.21 for the home team (the edge the fit finds once strength is in), nothing at a neutral site.
- Each expected number is then fit to the season’s games: a game bears out about 79% of the difference the model predicts.
- The shuffle keeps the season’s shape: the games are cut into stretches, one a 10 games, where the dates leave the least variance, each game is read against its stretch, and the sides are shuffled only inside each stretch.