Missouri State’s pass attempts with Jmariyae Robinson and without Jmariyae Robinson
, ,
Against what the season’s ratings expected, Missouri State was 0.2 pass attempts over with Jmariyae Robinson and 1.9 pass attempts over without Jmariyae Robinson over its last 21 games, 17 games against 2. The plain averages are 31.8 and 32.5, a difference of 0.7. Expected was 1.3 pass attempts higher with Jmariyae Robinson than without Jmariyae Robinson. All 10 home games were with Jmariyae Robinson. All 9 day games were with Jmariyae Robinson. Both opponents outside the major colleges were with Jmariyae Robinson.
Jmariyae Robinson, receiver: 1,030 receiving yards, 88 receptions and 8 receiving touchdowns in 19 of those 21 games, 0% of Missouri State’s pass attempts in those games.
2 games without Jmariyae Robinson is still too small a sample for the statistics to say much, but maybe you can find something if you squint.
pass attempts a game over expected
A −1.7 difference in pass attempts over expected with Jmariyae Robinson vs without Jmariyae Robinson is about what you’d expect.
A −0.7 difference in pass attempts with Jmariyae Robinson vs without Jmariyae Robinson is about what you’d expect.
The games
| Side | Date | Game | Result | pass attempts | Expected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30, 2025 | @ USC | L | 28 | 32.6 | |
| Sep 6, 2025 | @ Marshall | W | 32 | 31.0 | |
| Sep 13, 2025 | vs SMU | L | 37 | 35.9 | |
| Sep 20, 2025 | vsUUT Martin | W | 32 | — | |
| Sep 27, 2025 | vs Western Kentucky | L | 31 | 34.5 | |
| Oct 8, 2025 | @ Middle Tennessee | W | 31 | 32.6 | |
| Oct 22, 2025 | @ New Mexico State | W | 44 | 32.2 | |
| Oct 29, 2025 | vs Florida International | W | 27 | 33.1 | |
| Nov 8, 2025 | @ Liberty | W | 33 | 30.8 | |
| Nov 15, 2025 | vs UTEP | W | 39 | 31.3 | |
| Nov 22, 2025 | @ Kennesaw State | L | 33 | 32.2 | |
| Nov 29, 2025 | vs Louisiana Tech | L | 31 | 35.8 | |
| Dec 18, 2025 | vs Arkansas State (neutral) | L | 35 | 30.4 | |
| Sep 5, 2026 | @ Texas A&M | L | 17 | 28.6 | |
| Sep 12, 2026 | vsLLindenwood | W | 25 | — | |
| Sep 19, 2026 | vsMarshall | L | 29 | 33.5 | |
| Sep 26, 2026 | @SMU | L | 34 | 28.6 | |
| Oct 8, 2026 | @Western Kentucky | L | 38 | 26.5 | |
| Oct 14, 2026 | vsKennesaw State | W | 40 | 31.9 | |
| Oct 20, 2026 | @ Delaware | L | 35 | 32.9 | |
| Oct 27, 2026 | vs Sam Houston | W | 18 | 29.9 |
Method
- Expected is an offense and a defense a team, fit over every game of its season between two teams in the table with the game being read left out, minus 0.3 in 2025, minus 0.1 in 2026 for the home team (the edge the fit finds once strength is in), nothing at a neutral site.
- Each expected number is then fit to the season’s games: a game bears out about 73% in 2025, 60% in 2026 of the difference the model predicts.
- The shuffle keeps the season’s shape: the games are cut in two where one date leaves the least variance, each game is read against its stretch, and the sides are shuffled only inside each stretch.
- UT Martin, Lindenwood have no other game in the table, so those games have no expected number and sit out the second figure.
- Who played is read from the schools’ box scores’ participation lists, which name every player who entered the game.