
Stephen F. Austin’s rebounds at home and away
, ,
Against what the season’s ratings expected, Stephen F. Austin was 3.7 rebounds over at home and 2.8 rebounds under away over its last 60 games, 24 games against 25. The plain averages are 40.3 and 31.5, a difference of 8.8.
Stephen F. Austin’s +6.5 at home vs away over expected ranks 1st of the 363 teams with 6 games on each side over their last 60 games.
rebounds a game over expected
at home
+3.7
away
−2.8
-10010
A +6.5 difference in rebounds over expected at home vs away is rare: shuffle which games were at home and it comes up less than once in 100.
plain
40.3
31.5
204060
A +8.8 difference in rebounds at home vs away is rare: shuffle which games were at home and it comes up less than once in 100.
The games
at homeaway
| Side | Date | Game | Result | rebounds | Expected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 7, 2024 | @ | L | 19 | 34.0 | |
| Dec 14, 2024 | @ | W | 27 | 35.9 | |
| Dec 19, 2024 | @ | W | 35 | 30.1 | |
| Dec 21, 2024 | vs | W | 38 | 35.6 | |
| Dec 29, 2024 | vsTTexas A&M-San Antonio | W | 65 | — | |
| Jan 2, 2025 | vs | W | 42 | 35.5 | |
| Jan 4, 2025 | vs | W | 33 | 32.8 | |
| Jan 9, 2025 | vs | L | 35 | 32.7 | |
| Jan 11, 2025 | @ | L | 28 | 29.4 | |
| Jan 16, 2025 | @ | W | 47 | 38.1 | |
| Jan 18, 2025 | @ | L | 27 | 34.2 | |
| Jan 25, 2025 | vs | W | 38 | 33.2 | |
| Jan 27, 2025 | vs | W | 42 | 39.5 | |
| Jan 30, 2025 | @ | W | 37 | 37.3 | |
| Feb 1, 2025 | vs | W | 29 | 30.2 | |
| Feb 6, 2025 | vs | W | 35 | 33.8 | |
| Feb 8, 2025 | vs | W | 45 | 35.5 | |
| Feb 13, 2025 | @ | W | 42 | 38.7 | |
| Feb 15, 2025 | @ | W | 30 | 33.0 | |
| Feb 20, 2025 | @ | W | 28 | 35.7 | |
| Feb 22, 2025 | @ | W | 36 | 31.8 | |
| Feb 27, 2025 | vs | W | 48 | 38.9 | |
| Mar 1, 2025 | vs | W | 47 | 33.7 | |
| Mar 21, 2025 | @ | L | 25 | 27.2 | |
| Nov 3, 2025 | vsNNelson (TX) | W | 43 | — | |
| Nov 8, 2025 | vsTTexas A&M-Texarkana | W | 52 | — | |
| Nov 14, 2025 | vs | W | 32 | 30.1 | |
| Nov 17, 2025 | vs | W | 36 | 33.7 | |
| Nov 23, 2025 | @ | L | 21 | 30.0 | |
| Nov 27, 2025 | vs | W | 44 | 38.0 | |
| Nov 29, 2025 | vs | L | 38 | 37.9 | |
| Dec 6, 2025 | vs | W | 35 | 32.3 | |
| Dec 15, 2025 | vs | L | 32 | 33.6 | |
| Dec 17, 2025 | vs | W | 43 | 34.5 | |
| Dec 20, 2025 | @ | L | 39 | 34.3 | |
| Dec 29, 2025 | @ | L | 38 | 38.2 | |
| Dec 31, 2025 | @ | W | 30 | 31.6 | |
| Jan 3, 2026 | @ | W | 46 | 39.3 | |
| Jan 8, 2026 | vs | W | 33 | 34.4 | |
| Jan 10, 2026 | vs | W | 37 | 35.3 | |
| Jan 15, 2026 | @ | W | 35 | 34.8 | |
| Jan 17, 2026 | @ | W | 37 | 41.5 | |
| Jan 22, 2026 | vs | W | 32 | 32.3 | |
| Jan 24, 2026 | @ | L | 23 | 30.2 | |
| Jan 29, 2026 | vs | L | 38 | 33.6 | |
| Jan 31, 2026 | vs | W | 52 | 39.7 | |
| Feb 5, 2026 | vs | L | 39 | 38.9 | |
| Feb 7, 2026 | vs | W | 38 | 30.0 | |
| Feb 12, 2026 | @ | W | 33 | 34.4 | |
| Feb 14, 2026 | @ | W | 20 | 33.5 | |
| Feb 19, 2026 | vs | W | 42 | 42.0 | |
| Feb 21, 2026 | vs | W | 38 | 35.4 | |
| Feb 26, 2026 | @ | W | 31 | 33.8 | |
| Feb 28, 2026 | @ | W | 30 | 35.0 | |
| Mar 2, 2026 | @ | L | 23 | 33.8 | |
| Mar 10, 2026 | vs | W | 42 | 34.8 | |
| Mar 11, 2026 | vs | W | 27 | 30.3 | |
| Mar 12, 2026 | vs | W | 38 | 33.3 | |
| Mar 18, 2026 | vs | L | 27 | 30.4 | |
| Nov 4, 2026 | vsDDallas | W | 47 | — |
Method
- Expected is an offense and a defense a team, fit over every game of its season between two teams in the table with the game being read left out, plus 0.4 in 2024-25, plus 0.4 in 2025-26, plus 0.0 in 2026-27 for the home team (the edge the fit finds once strength is in), nothing at a neutral site.
- Each expected number is then fit to the season’s games: a game bears out about 90% in 2024-25, 91% in 2025-26, NaN% in 2026-27 of the difference the model predicts.
- The shuffle keeps the season’s shape: the games are cut in two where one date leaves the least variance, each game is read against its stretch, and the sides are shuffled only inside each stretch.
- Texas A&M-San Antonio, Nelson (TX), Texas A&M-Texarkana, Dallas have no other game in the table, so those games have no expected number and sit out the second figure.