Putting Up Numbers· women's college basketball

East Texas A&M’s 3-pointers made at home and away

, ,

Against what the season’s ratings expected, East Texas A&M was 1.4 3-pointers made over at home and 1.5 3-pointers made under away in 2025-26, 13 games against 14. The plain averages are 7.3 and 4.6, a difference of 2.7. Both ranked opponents were away.

East Texas A&M’s +2.9 at home vs away over expected ranks 2nd of the 363 teams with 6 games on each side in 2025-26.

3-pointers made a game over expected

A +2.9 difference in 3-pointers made over expected at home vs away is rare: shuffle which games were at home and it comes up less than once in 100.

A +2.7 difference in 3-pointers made at home vs away is rare: shuffle which games were at home and it comes up less than once in 100.

The games

at homeaway
East Texas A&M’s games, 2025-26, each marked at home or away
SideDateGameResult3-pointers madeExpected
Nov 3, 2025vsUUNT DallasW9—
Nov 5, 2025@Oklahoma StateL65.2
Nov 9, 2025vsUUT DallasW3—
Nov 19, 2025@OklahomaL65.7
Nov 22, 2025@SE LouisianaL46.9
Dec 2, 2025@LouisianaW86.8
Dec 6, 2025vsAbilene ChristianL55.1
Dec 12, 2025@McNeeseL55.3
Dec 15, 2025vsTexas SouthernW76.1
Dec 29, 2025vsStephen F. AustinW85.8
Dec 31, 2025vsLamarL35.3
Jan 3, 2026@LSU New OrleansW47.9
Jan 8, 2026vsTexas A&M-Corpus ChristiW126.5
Jan 10, 2026vsUT Rio Grande ValleyL76.7
Jan 15, 2026@Incarnate WordL25.7
Jan 17, 2026@Houston ChristianL36.4
Jan 22, 2026@LamarL35.0
Jan 29, 2026vsLSU New OrleansW117.7
Jan 31, 2026vsNichollsW76.5
Feb 5, 2026@Stephen F. AustinW35.9
Feb 7, 2026vsNorthwestern StateW95.2
Feb 12, 2026vsSE LouisianaW86.9
Feb 14, 2026vsMcNeeseL75.4
Feb 16, 2026@Northwestern StateL35.3
Feb 19, 2026vsHouston ChristianL66.5
Feb 21, 2026vsIncarnate WordL85.6
Feb 26, 2026@Texas A&M-Corpus ChristiW76.6
Feb 28, 2026@UT Rio Grande ValleyL76.5
Mar 3, 2026@NichollsL46.4
Mar 9, 2026vsNorthwestern State (neutral)L75.2

Method

Read against .

  • Expected is an offense and a defense a team, fit over every 2025-26 game between two teams in the table with the game being read left out, plus 0.1 for the home team (the edge the fit finds once strength is in), nothing at a neutral site.
  • Each expected number is then fit to the season’s games: a game bears out about 86% of the difference the model predicts.
  • The shuffle keeps the season’s shape: the games are cut in two where one date leaves the least variance, each game is read against its stretch, and the sides are shuffled only inside each stretch.
  • UNT Dallas, UT Dallas have no other game in the table, so those games have no expected number and sit out the second figure.