
Kent State’s rebounds at home and away
, ,
Against what the season’s ratings expected, Kent State was 4.5 rebounds under at home and NaN rebounds over away over its last 60 games, 25 games against 26. The plain averages are 32.3 and 38.7, a difference of 6.4.
Kent State’s NaN at home vs away over expected ranks 1st of the 365 teams with 6 games on each side over their last 60 games.
rebounds a game over expected
at home
−4.5
away
NaN
A NaN difference in rebounds over expected at home vs away is rare: shuffle which games were at home and it comes up less than once in 100.
plain
32.3
38.7
304050
A −6.4 difference in rebounds at home vs away is rare: shuffle which games were at home and it comes up less than once in 100.
The games
at homeaway
| Side | Date | Game | Result | rebounds | Expected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 29, 2024 | vsHHeidelberg | W | 32 | — | |
| Jan 4, 2025 | vs | L | 24 | 35.9 | |
| Jan 7, 2025 | @ | W | 47 | 39.0 | |
| Jan 10, 2025 | @ | W | 42 | 36.3 | |
| Jan 14, 2025 | vs | L | 25 | 35.4 | |
| Jan 18, 2025 | vs | L | 24 | 34.3 | |
| Jan 21, 2025 | @ | W | 26 | 34.1 | |
| Jan 24, 2025 | @ | L | 42 | 33.9 | |
| Jan 28, 2025 | vs | W | 28 | 35.1 | |
| Jan 31, 2025 | vs | L | 29 | 33.8 | |
| Feb 4, 2025 | @ | W | 43 | 33.4 | |
| Feb 8, 2025 | vs | W | 29 | 35.7 | |
| Feb 11, 2025 | vs | W | 28 | 33.1 | |
| Feb 14, 2025 | vs | W | 33 | 35.1 | |
| Feb 18, 2025 | @ | W | 31 | 34.2 | |
| Feb 21, 2025 | @ | L | 37 | 32.8 | |
| Feb 25, 2025 | vs | W | 38 | 34.2 | |
| Feb 28, 2025 | @ | L | 31 | 33.0 | |
| Mar 4, 2025 | @ | W | 46 | 33.5 | |
| Mar 7, 2025 | vs | W | 29 | 34.9 | |
| Mar 13, 2025 | vs | W | 33 | 34.6 | |
| Mar 14, 2025 | vs | L | 38 | 33.1 | |
| Mar 18, 2025 | @ | W | 45 | 31.0 | |
| Mar 23, 2025 | @ | W | 40 | 29.2 | |
| Mar 26, 2025 | @ | L | 32 | 31.3 | |
| Nov 3, 2025 | vs | L | 44 | 34.3 | |
| Nov 7, 2025 | vs | W | 27 | 34.7 | |
| Nov 10, 2025 | vs | W | 36 | 33.5 | |
| Nov 15, 2025 | vs | W | 28 | 38.2 | |
| Nov 16, 2025 | vs | W | 41 | 32.7 | |
| Nov 18, 2025 | vs | W | 36 | 36.3 | |
| Nov 22, 2025 | vs | W | 39 | 37.9 | |
| Nov 29, 2025 | vsPPenn State Shenango | W | 55 | — | |
| Dec 3, 2025 | vs | W | 26 | 37.4 | |
| Dec 6, 2025 | vsRRoberts Wesleyan | W | 46 | — | |
| Dec 14, 2025 | @ | L | 32 | 33.1 | |
| Dec 20, 2025 | @ | W | 37 | 32.7 | |
| Dec 29, 2025 | @ | L | 27 | 27.7 | |
| Jan 3, 2026 | vs | W | 24 | 36.0 | |
| Jan 6, 2026 | vs | W | 22 | 36.1 | |
| Jan 10, 2026 | @ | L | 47 | 34.6 | |
| Jan 13, 2026 | @ | W | 44 | 33.9 | |
| Jan 16, 2026 | vs | W | 36 | 36.2 | |
| Jan 20, 2026 | vs | L | 37 | 35.2 | |
| Jan 24, 2026 | @ | W | 41 | 35.2 | |
| Jan 27, 2026 | vs | W | 46 | 36.1 | |
| Jan 30, 2026 | @ | L | 48 | 32.0 | |
| Feb 3, 2026 | @ | W | 43 | 35.1 | |
| Feb 7, 2026 | @ | L | 32 | 33.4 | |
| Feb 11, 2026 | vs | W | 25 | 36.8 | |
| Feb 14, 2026 | @ | W | 40 | 36.1 | |
| Feb 17, 2026 | @ | W | 38 | 34.5 | |
| Feb 24, 2026 | vs | W | 30 | 36.4 | |
| Feb 27, 2026 | vs | L | 25 | 34.0 | |
| Mar 3, 2026 | @ | W | 36 | 34.6 | |
| Mar 6, 2026 | vs | W | 31 | 35.7 | |
| Mar 12, 2026 | vs | W | 29 | 36.7 | |
| Mar 13, 2026 | vs | L | 42 | 32.7 | |
| Mar 18, 2026 | @ | L | 40 | 32.8 | |
| Nov 2, 2026 | @ | L | 40 | NaN |
Method
- Expected is an offense and a defense a team, fit over every game of its season between two teams in the table with the game being read left out, plus 0.4 in 2024-25, plus 0.4 in 2025-26, plus 0.0 in 2026-27 for the home team (the edge the fit finds once strength is in), nothing at a neutral site.
- Each expected number is then fit to the season’s games: a game bears out about 86% in 2024-25, 87% in 2025-26, NaN% in 2026-27 of the difference the model predicts.
- The shuffle keeps the season’s shape: the games are cut in two where one date leaves the least variance, each game is read against its stretch, and the sides are shuffled only inside each stretch.
- Heidelberg, Penn State Shenango, Roberts Wesleyan have no other game in the table, so those games have no expected number and sit out the second figure.