Ohio’s points allowed with Nick Poulos and without Nick Poulos
, ,
Against what the season’s ratings expected, Ohio was 0.4 points over with Nick Poulos and 1.8 points under without Nick Poulos over its last 25 games, 4 games against 18. The plain averages are 22.0 and 21.1, a difference of 0.9. Expected was 2.5 points higher with Nick Poulos than without Nick Poulos. All 3 neutral-site games were without Nick Poulos. Both bowl and playoff games were without Nick Poulos. All 3 of Tim Albin’s games were without Nick Poulos.
Nick Poulos, quarterback: 1,021 passing yards, 129 pass attempts and 75 completions in 10 of those 25 games.
points allowed a game over expected
A +2.2 difference in points allowed over expected with Nick Poulos vs without Nick Poulos is about what you’d expect.
A +0.9 difference in points allowed with Nick Poulos vs without Nick Poulos is unusual: shuffle which games were with Nick Poulos and it comes up once in 100.
The games
| Side | Date | Game | Result | points allowed | Expected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 29, 2024 | vs Ball State | W | 21 | 18.8 | |
| Dec 7, 2024 | vs Miami (OH) (neutral) | W | 3 | 21.6 | |
| Dec 20, 2024 | vs Jacksonville State (neutral) | W | 27 | 26.5 | |
| Aug 28, 2025 | @ Rutgers | L | 34 | 32.3 | |
| Sep 6, 2025 | vs West Virginia | W | 10 | 25.5 | |
| Sep 13, 2025 | @ Ohio State | L | 37 | 36.3 | |
| Sep 20, 2025 | vsGGardner-Webb | W | 35 | — | |
| Sep 27, 2025 | vs Bowling Green | W | 20 | 14.7 | |
| Oct 4, 2025 | @Ball State | L | 20 | 15.0 | |
| Oct 18, 2025 | vs Northern Illinois | W | 21 | 13.4 | |
| Oct 25, 2025 | @ Eastern Michigan | W | 21 | 23.2 | |
| Nov 4, 2025 | vsMiami (OH) | W | 20 | 20.6 | |
| Nov 11, 2025 | @ Western Michigan | L | 17 | 22.7 | |
| Nov 18, 2025 | vs UMass | W | 14 | 9.2 | |
| Nov 28, 2025 | @ Buffalo | W | 26 | 17.4 | |
| Dec 23, 2025 | vs UNLV (neutral) | W | 10 | 33.3 | |
| Sep 5, 2026 | @ Nebraska | L | 49 | 33.3 | |
| Sep 12, 2026 | vsJacksonville State | W | 27 | 25.2 | |
| Sep 19, 2026 | @ South Alabama | L | 41 | 33.1 | |
| Sep 26, 2026 | vsSStonehill | W | 7 | — | |
| Oct 3, 2026 | @ Kent State | W | 10 | 22.5 | |
| Oct 10, 2026 | vs Central Michigan | W | 14 | 24.6 | |
| Oct 17, 2026 | @SSacramento State | W | 7 | — | |
| Oct 24, 2026 | vsEastern Michigan | W | 20 | 21.0 | |
| Nov 3, 2026 | @ Akron | W | 20 | 22.4 |
Method
- Expected is an offense and a defense a team, fit over every game of its season between two teams in the table with the game being read left out, minus 1.5 in 2024, minus 1.5 in 2025, minus 1.8 in 2026 for the home team (the edge the fit finds once strength is in), nothing at a neutral site.
- Each expected number is then fit to the season’s games: a game bears out about 75% in 2024, 78% in 2025, 66% in 2026 of the difference the model predicts.
- The shuffle keeps the season’s shape: the games are cut in two where one date leaves the least variance, each game is read against its stretch, and the sides are shuffled only inside each stretch.
- Gardner-Webb, Stonehill, Sacramento State have no other game in the table, so those games have no expected number and sit out the second figure.
- Who played is read from the schools’ box scores’ participation lists for 21 of these 25 games; in the other 4 a player is counted as in them when the box score has a stat for him.
- With him means he was the team’s quarterback that game, at least half of its pass attempts; a game he left early or came into late reads as without him.