Ohio’s pass attempts with Duncan Brune and without Duncan Brune
, ,
Against what the season’s ratings expected, Ohio was 2.6 pass attempts under with Duncan Brune and 3.9 pass attempts under without Duncan Brune over its last 25 games, 17 games against 5. The plain averages are 23.4 and 23.5, a difference of 0.1. Expected was 2.1 pass attempts lower with Duncan Brune than without Duncan Brune. All 3 games after a bye were with Duncan Brune. All 4 of Tim Albin’s games were without Duncan Brune. All 12 of Brian Smith’s games were with Duncan Brune.
Duncan Brune, running back: 937 rushing yards, 201 carries and 10 receptions in 19 of those 25 games.
pass attempts a game over expected
A +1.3 difference in pass attempts over expected with Duncan Brune vs without Duncan Brune is about what you’d expect.
A −0.1 difference in pass attempts with Duncan Brune vs without Duncan Brune is about what you’d expect.
The games
| Side | Date | Game | Result | pass attempts | Expected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 20, 2024 | @ Toledo | W | 19 | 29.4 | |
| Nov 29, 2024 | vs Ball State | W | 15 | 30.1 | |
| Dec 7, 2024 | vs Miami (OH) (neutral) | W | 27 | 28.6 | |
| Dec 20, 2024 | vs Jacksonville State (neutral) | W | 28 | 25.7 | |
| Aug 28, 2025 | @ Rutgers | L | 31 | 22.0 | |
| Sep 6, 2025 | vs West Virginia | W | 31 | 27.5 | |
| Sep 13, 2025 | @ Ohio State | L | 21 | 23.3 | |
| Sep 20, 2025 | vsGGardner-Webb | W | 27 | — | |
| Sep 27, 2025 | vs Bowling Green | W | 25 | 23.4 | |
| Oct 4, 2025 | @Ball State | L | 29 | 25.3 | |
| Oct 18, 2025 | vs Northern Illinois | W | 23 | 24.1 | |
| Oct 25, 2025 | @ Eastern Michigan | W | 28 | 25.2 | |
| Nov 4, 2025 | vsMiami (OH) | W | 31 | 29.0 | |
| Nov 11, 2025 | @ Western Michigan | L | 19 | 27.0 | |
| Nov 18, 2025 | vs UMass | W | 8 | 26.2 | |
| Nov 28, 2025 | @ Buffalo | W | 23 | 25.8 | |
| Dec 23, 2025 | vs UNLV (neutral) | W | 15 | 28.0 | |
| Sep 5, 2026 | @ Nebraska | L | 32 | 26.4 | |
| Sep 12, 2026 | vsJacksonville State | W | 19 | 23.2 | |
| Sep 19, 2026 | @ South Alabama | L | 31 | 25.8 | |
| Sep 26, 2026 | vsSStonehill | W | 21 | — | |
| Oct 3, 2026 | @ Kent State | W | 14 | 28.5 | |
| Oct 10, 2026 | vs Central Michigan | W | 18 | 28.5 | |
| Oct 17, 2026 | @SSacramento State | W | 22 | — | |
| Oct 24, 2026 | vsEastern Michigan | W | 29 | 26.5 |
Method
- Expected is an offense and a defense a team, fit over every game of its season between two teams in the table with the game being read left out, minus 0.4 in 2024, minus 0.3 in 2025, minus 0.1 in 2026 for the home team (the edge the fit finds once strength is in), nothing at a neutral site.
- Each expected number is then fit to the season’s games: a game bears out about 73% in 2024, 73% in 2025, 60% in 2026 of the difference the model predicts.
- The shuffle keeps the season’s shape: the games are cut in two where one date leaves the least variance, each game is read against its stretch, and the sides are shuffled only inside each stretch.
- Gardner-Webb, Stonehill, Sacramento State have no other game in the table, so those games have no expected number and sit out the second figure.
- Who played is read from the schools’ box scores’ participation lists for 21 of these 25 games; in the other 4 a player is counted as in them when the box score has a stat for him.