
Louisiana Monroe’s third-down conversion rate with Zach Palmer-Smith and without Zach Palmer-Smith
, ,
Against what the season’s ratings expected, Louisiana Monroe was 4.5 percentage points under with Zach Palmer-Smith and 12.6 percentage points under without Zach Palmer-Smith over its last 25 games, 16 games against 2. The plain averages are 30.2% and 33.6%, a difference of 3.4%. All 12 conference games were with Zach Palmer-Smith. All 3 games after a bye were with Zach Palmer-Smith.
Zach Palmer-Smith, running back: 816 rushing yards, 149 carries and 11 receptions in 17 of those 25 games.
3 games without Zach Palmer-Smith is still too small a sample for the statistics to say much, but maybe you can find something if you squint.
third-down conversion rate a game over expected
A +8.0% difference in third-down conversion rate over expected with Zach Palmer-Smith vs without Zach Palmer-Smith is about what you’d expect.
A −3.4% difference in third-down conversion rate with Zach Palmer-Smith vs without Zach Palmer-Smith is about what you’d expect.
The games
| Side | Date | Game | Result | 3rd downs | Expected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2, 2024 | @ | L | 27.3% | 32.4% | |
| Nov 9, 2024 | vs | L | 18.2% | 37.8% | |
| Nov 16, 2024 | @ | L | 16.7% | 34.4% | |
| Nov 23, 2024 | @ | L | 36.4% | 41.7% | |
| Nov 30, 2024 | vs | L | 46.7% | 37.5% | |
| Aug 28, 2025 | vsSSt. Francis (PA) | W | 41.7% | — | |
| Sep 6, 2025 | @ | L | 42.9% | 27.5% | |
| Sep 20, 2025 | @ | W | 20.0% | 28.8% | |
| Sep 27, 2025 | vs | W | 46.2% | 36.1% | |
| Oct 4, 2025 | @ | L | 30.0% | 32.6% | |
| Oct 11, 2025 | @ | L | 7.7% | 36.9% | |
| Oct 18, 2025 | vs | L | 38.5% | 33.9% | |
| Oct 25, 2025 | @ | L | 56.3% | 35.7% | |
| Nov 1, 2025 | vs | L | 0.0% | 33.8% | |
| Nov 15, 2025 | vs | L | 11.1% | 37.1% | |
| Nov 22, 2025 | @ | L | 38.5% | 35.6% | |
| Nov 29, 2025 | @ | L | 38.5% | 36.2% | |
| Sep 5, 2026 | @ | L | 18.8% | 33.1% | |
| Sep 12, 2026 | @ | L | 25.0% | 35.8% | |
| Sep 19, 2026 | vsSS E Louisiana | L | 57.1% | — | |
| Sep 26, 2026 | vs | L | 30.8% | 36.4% | |
| Oct 3, 2026 | @ | L | 23.1% | 34.1% | |
| Oct 17, 2026 | vs | L | 18.2% | 34.8% | |
| Oct 24, 2026 | @ | W | 26.7% | 32.4% | |
| Oct 31, 2026 | vs | L | 43.8% | 32.8% |
Method
- Expected is an offense and a defense a team, fit over every game of its season between two teams in the table with the game being read left out, plus 0.7% in 2025, plus 1.4% in 2026 for the home team (the edge the fit finds once strength is in), nothing at a neutral site.
- Each expected number is then fit to the season’s games: a game bears out about 56% in 2025, 40% in 2026 of the difference the model predicts.
- The shuffle keeps the season’s shape: the games are cut in two where one date leaves the least variance, each game is read against its stretch, and the sides are shuffled only inside each stretch.
- St. Francis (PA), S E Louisiana have no other game in the table, so those games have no expected number and sit out the second figure.
- Who played is read from the schools’ box scores’ participation lists, which name every player who entered the game.
- 5 games in 2024 are neither with Zach Palmer-Smith nor without Zach Palmer-Smith: Zach Palmer-Smith had no game for the team that season, and sit out.