Putting Up Numbers· college football

Duke’s pass attempts with Javen Nicholas and without Javen Nicholas

, ,

Against what the season’s ratings expected, Duke was 2.7 pass attempts over with Javen Nicholas and 7.7 pass attempts under without Javen Nicholas in 2026, 5 games against 2. The plain averages are 32.0 and 27.7, a difference of 4.3. All 5 conference games were with Javen Nicholas. All 3 nonconference games were without Javen Nicholas. All 4 second-half games were with Javen Nicholas.

Javen Nicholas, receiver: 57 receiving yards and 4 receptions in 3 games this season.

3 games without Javen Nicholas is still too small a sample for the statistics to say much, but maybe you can find something if you squint.

pass attempts a game over expected

A +10.4 difference in pass attempts over expected with Javen Nicholas vs without Javen Nicholas is about what you’d expect.

A +4.3 difference in pass attempts with Javen Nicholas vs without Javen Nicholas is about what you’d expect.

The games

with Javen Nicholaswithout Javen Nicholas
Duke’s games, 2026, each marked with Javen Nicholas or without Javen Nicholas
SideDateGameResultpass attemptsExpected
Sep 5, 2026vsTulaneW2731.7
Sep 12, 2026@IllinoisW2232.7
Sep 19, 2026vsStanfordW2433.3
Sep 26, 2026vsWilliam & MaryW34—
Oct 10, 2026@Georgia TechL4126.7
Oct 17, 2026vsNorth CarolinaL3930.6
Oct 23, 2026@VirginiaW3127.1
Oct 31, 2026vsBoston CollegeW2528.5

Method

Read against .

  • Expected is an offense and a defense a team, fit over every 2026 game between two teams in the table with the game being read left out, minus 0.1 for the home team (the edge the fit finds once strength is in), nothing at a neutral site.
  • Each expected number is then fit to the season’s games: a game bears out about 60% of the difference the model predicts.
  • The shuffle keeps the season’s shape: the games are cut in two where one date leaves the least variance, each game is read against its stretch, and the sides are shuffled only inside each stretch.
  • William & Mary has no other game in the table, so that game has no expected number and sits out the second figure.
  • Who played is read from the schools’ box scores’ participation lists, which name every player who entered the game.