BYU’s pass attempts with LJ Martin and without LJ Martin
, ,
Against what the season’s ratings expected, BYU was 2.5 pass attempts under with LJ Martin and 5.4 pass attempts over without LJ Martin over its last 25 games, 18 games against 5. The plain averages are 26.6 and 33.8, a difference of 7.2. Both opponents outside the major colleges were with LJ Martin. All 3 games while unranked were with LJ Martin. All 3 games after a bye were with LJ Martin.
LJ Martin, running back: 1,866 rushing yards, 327 carries and 45 receptions in 20 of those 25 games.
pass attempts a game over expected
A −7.9 difference in pass attempts over expected with LJ Martin vs without LJ Martin is unusual: shuffle which games were with LJ Martin and it comes up 5 times in 100.
A −7.2 difference in pass attempts with LJ Martin vs without LJ Martin is a bit unusual: shuffle which games were with LJ Martin and it comes up 8 times in 100.
The games
| Side | Date | Game | Result | pass attempts | Expected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 23, 2024 | @ Arizona State | L | 38 | 30.2 | |
| Nov 30, 2024 | vs Houston | W | 19 | 26.6 | |
| Dec 28, 2024 | vs Colorado (neutral) | W | 23 | 28.7 | |
| Aug 30, 2025 | vsPPortland State | W | 18 | — | |
| Sep 6, 2025 | vs Stanford | W | 27 | 32.2 | |
| Sep 20, 2025 | @ East Carolina | W | 26 | 33.3 | |
| Sep 27, 2025 | @Colorado | W | 29 | 25.0 | |
| Oct 3, 2025 | vs West Virginia | W | 25 | 31.5 | |
| Oct 11, 2025 | @ Arizona | W | 29 | 27.3 | |
| Oct 18, 2025 | vs Utah | W | 23 | 28.0 | |
| Oct 25, 2025 | @ Iowa State | W | 35 | 29.6 | |
| Nov 8, 2025 | @ Texas Tech | L | 38 | 32.0 | |
| Nov 15, 2025 | vs TCU | W | 33 | 29.7 | |
| Nov 22, 2025 | @ Cincinnati | W | 25 | 30.6 | |
| Nov 29, 2025 | vs UCF | W | 25 | 28.7 | |
| Dec 6, 2025 | vsTexas Tech (neutral) | L | 29 | 32.9 | |
| Dec 27, 2025 | vs Georgia Tech (neutral) | W | 40 | 27.6 | |
| Sep 5, 2026 | vsUUtah Tech | W | 22 | — | |
| Sep 12, 2026 | vsArizona | W | 26 | 32.1 | |
| Sep 19, 2026 | @ Colorado State | W | 17 | 28.0 | |
| Oct 3, 2026 | @TCU | W | 24 | 28.8 | |
| Oct 9, 2026 | vsIowa State | W | 30 | 29.1 | |
| Oct 17, 2026 | vs Notre Dame | W | 37 | 26.1 | |
| Oct 24, 2026 | @UCF | L | 32 | 28.8 | |
| Oct 31, 2026 | vsArizona State | W | 30 | 30.4 |
Method
- Expected is an offense and a defense a team, fit over every game of its season between two teams in the table with the game being read left out, minus 0.4 in 2024, minus 0.3 in 2025, minus 0.1 in 2026 for the home team (the edge the fit finds once strength is in), nothing at a neutral site.
- Each expected number is then fit to the season’s games: a game bears out about 73% in 2024, 73% in 2025, 60% in 2026 of the difference the model predicts.
- The shuffle keeps the season’s shape: the games are cut in two where one date leaves the least variance, each game is read against its stretch, and the sides are shuffled only inside each stretch.
- Portland State, Utah Tech have no other game in the table, so those games have no expected number and sit out the second figure.
- Who played is read from the schools’ box scores’ participation lists for 13 of these 25 games; in the other 12 a player is counted as in them when the box score has a stat for him.